Home » Posts tagged 'War on Women'
Tag Archives: War on Women
Latest GOP Budget Marks Latest Attack on Women
Budgets are statements of values and priorities. Based on the GOP’s latest budget, apparently the interests of women are not a priority.
Here’s a look at how the GOP budget is bad for women and children.
Here’s a link to a comparison of the numbers of all three versions of Ryan’s Path to Poverty budgets. [Numbers compiled from 112-HCONRES34, 112-HCONRES112, 113-HCONRES###]
Evening Brief: Important Stories That You Might’ve Missed
- No, lowering taxes doesn’t grow the economy.
- South Carolina GOP lawmaker suggest they blocked Medicaid expansion because Obama is black.
- Is Texas turning blue?
- Even Paul Ryan admits that we’re not facing a debt crisis.
- Latest GOP budget gives millionaires at least a $200,000 tax cut.
- It’s time for the Obama administration to lift its secrecy on drones.
- The new pope’s views on LGBT equality.
- Everything you need to know about the Steubenville rape trial.
- President Obama evolves even further on marriage equality.
This material [the article above] was created by the Center for American Progress Action Fund. It was created for the Progress Report, the daily e-mail publication of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. Click here to subscribe.
Under the Reading Lamp — 4/30/2012
ALEC’s Comeuppance
|
Putting Our Premiums Into Medical Care, Not Profits
|
Top Republican Strategist Denies Women are Paid Less Than Men
|
Five Tax Fallacies Invented by the 1%
|
AZ Lawmakers Lash Out at Imaginary United Nations Conspiracy With Assault on All Poverty & Environmental Laws
|
War, Money, and Moral Hazard
|
Don’t Let Congress Kick College Grads in the Teeth
|
Trickle-Down Gulf Wreck-onomics
|
Feds File First Criminal Charges Related to BP Gulf Spill
|
Fracking Industry California Dreamin’: A Future California Nightmare?
|
Chesapeake Energy Well Blowout in Wyoming Causes Evacuation, Methane “Roared” for Days
|
Rights Groups Hold International Drone Summit in Washington, DC
|
The Viet Nam Conflict and the Fabricated Lies of War
|
Burden of Proof: Geithner, Obama, and Wall Street’s Unpunished Crimes
|
Under the Reading Lamp — 3/12/2012
Physicians in Congress Committing Malpractice on Millions
|
|
Nine States Have Legalized Malpractice Against Women
|
|
Reid: Republicans Exaggerating Benefits of Keystone XL Pipeline
|
|
Electoral chaos-History repeats? The “house” decides?
|
|
The Border Wall: The Last Stand at Making the US a White Gated Community
|
|
How Public Sector Layoffs Are Holding Back the Recovery
|
|
Canadian Government Targeting Opponents of New Oil Sands Pipeline
|
|
Environmental Protection Agency Puts Greenhouse Gas Rules for Oil Refineries on Backburner
|
|
Mike Konczal, New Deal 2.0: “As the one percent reap 93 percent of the income gains from the recovery, we’re rapidly returning to pre-New Deal levels of inequality … It’s important to remember that a series of choices were made during the New Deal to react to runaway inequality, including changes to progressive taxation, financial regulation, monetary policy, labor unionization, and the provisioning of public goods and guaranteed social insurance. A battle will be fought over the next decade on all these fronts.” |
|
A Field of Hawks |
|
A Sex Ed 101 Curriculum for Conservatives Recent national kerfuffles over abortion and contraception access bring up many important questions: Should employers retain control over your wages and benefits after they sign them over to you? Is contraception, a service used by 99 percent of American women, really so controversial? How much state regulation should there be over women’s most private decisions? But amidst all those questions is one overarching one: Do conservatives need a crash course in sex ed? |
|
Julie Gillard’s Rise Marks the Triumph of Machine Politics Over Feminism
|
|
Busted for Busting Out at Bank of America
|
|
Jim Hightower | Attack of the Billionaires
Jim Hightower, Op-Ed: “Hosted by the billionaire Koch brothers at the posh Renaissance Esmeralda golf resort in California’s Palm Springs desert in early February, the confabulees were mobilizing and monetizing what Charles Koch called the “mother of all wars.” That would be their self-proclaimed war to enthrone their ilk over workers, consumers, the environment, and democracy itself.” |
|
Catholicism is Not the Tea Party at Prayer
|
|
Efficiency Standards to Save Americans More Than $1 Trillion by 2035
Stephen Lacey, News Analysis: Assuming that 11 new standards being considered for computer equipment, electric motors, fans, and pumps get established, the U.S. could see a 14% reduction in annual electricity use by 2035 compared with current projections. According to the ACEEE report, assuming household appliances are updated every 15 years through 2040, the average American household could save 180 megawatt-hours of electricity and over 200,000 gallons of water. Translated into understandable figures: Roughly $30,000. |
|
Tom Engelhardt | The 0% Doctrine
Tom Engelhardt, Op-Ed: “The president had offered a new definition of “aggression” against this country and a new war doctrine to go with it. He would, he insisted, take the U.S. to war not to stop another nation from attacking us or even threatening to do so, but simply to stop it from building a nuclear weapon — and he would act even if that country were incapable of targeting the United States. That should have been news.” |
If there’s a “Compromise” at all …
I’ve been listening to all the hooplaw about HHS Secretary Sibelius’ decision relative to contraception coverage rules under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act —PPACA (the health care reform act) and find the divide disturbing. Male pundits appear to be arguing for religious rights, drowning out the voices of female pundits who are attempting to argue for women’s rights.
Both sides need to sit down, shut up and think the situation through, looking for a solution that allows a successful outcome for both sides. But, thus far, instead of looking for a means to resolve the rights of both, each is arguing for one group to have to sacrifice their rights at the expense of the other … that somehow women have to take a back seat to religion … or vice versa.
What if neither side had to sacrifice their rights? They don’t … you know. It’s all in how one looks at the problem. You see, the problem is the means through which one assumes the health insurance must be delivered to the employee. Both sides are looking at the situation as though the religiously-affiliated organization MUST be the deliverer of the health care insurance policy.
If they delay introduction of this requirement until PPACA is fully implemented, and if the Churches then stop providing health insurance (adjusting employee salaries accordingly to be able to compete for employees in the employment market), their employees could purchase through the exchanges, a health insurance policy appropriate for their needs.
Such a solution would allow both sides of the equation to remain equal in terms of rights retained. Churches and their sponsored organizations would not have to fund health insurance programs that include birth control coverage. Women and families who work for those religiously affiliated schools and/or hospitals, who do not espouse those religious precepts, would not be denied coverage and thus have to incur the full commercial expense for birth control.
It’s a simple and elegant solution … but in today’s reality, I’m not sure either side will be willing to put aside their rhetoric and take action that will move us toward an equitable solution. I fear instead this will be yet one more volley in the GOP’s war on womens’ rights and liberties.
Amodei/Heck Vote for HR358, the “Let Women Die Act”
Have you heard about yesterday’s House approval of HR358, deceptively called the “protect life act,” which is really a “let women die” act?
Republicans are waging a War on Women. Since taking over the House, the radical right has been actively working to roll back the freedoms and protections of American women. They are not just attacking our right to choose, but threatening our actual health. 236 of 238 Republicans voted for passage. It’s like group-think. Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL13) and Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY24) were the only Republicans to cast a NO vote.
Fifteen Democratic representatives also voted for passage of this bill: Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR4); Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-GA2); Rep. Daniel Lipiniski (D-IL3); Rep. Jerry Costello (D-IL12); Rep. Joe Donnelly (D-IN2); Rep. Dale Kildee, (D-MI5); Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN7); Rep Mike McIntyre (D-NC7); Rep. Heath Shuler (D-NC11); Rep. Dan Boren (D-OK2); Rep. Jason Altmire (D-PA4); Rep. Mark Critz (D-PA-12); Rep. Tim Holden (D-PA-17); Rep. Jim Matheson (D-UT2); and Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV3).
In case you haven’t been following this one, here’s a brief summary of this bill:
- Amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to prohibit federal funds from being to used to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion services. (Currently, federal funds cannot be used for abortion services and plans receiving federal funds must keep federal funds segregated from any funds for abortion services.)
- Requires any qualified health benefit plan offered through an Exchange, that includes coverage for abortions, to also offer a qualified health benefit plan through the Exchange that is identical in every respect except that it does not cover abortions. (This is currently a requirement under PPACA.)
- Prohibits a federal agency or program and any state or local government that receives federal financial assistance under PPACA from requiring any health plan created or regulated under PPACA to discriminate against any institutional or individual health care entity based on the entity’s refusal to undergo training in the performance of induced abortions, require or provide such training, or refer for such training. (Isn’t that just lovely. If you’re a woman who’s experiencing a miscarriage, and that miscarriage is incomplete, you’re bleeding profusely and you need a procedure to complete that miscarriage which incidentally is also known as an abortion procedure … and no one is trained or qualified to provide that service/procedure at your local hospital … you’re probably going to bleed to death.)
- Creates a cause of action for any violations of the abortion provisions of PPACA. Gives federal courts jurisdiction to prevent and redress actual or threatened violations of such provisions by issuing any form of legal or equitable relief, including injunctions and orders preventing the disbursement of all or a portion of federal financial assistance until the prohibited conduct has ceased. (Oh Great! To ensure the GOP version of death panels for women has some teeth to ensure the mother’s life is not saved, they’ve given the courts considerable authority for both actual and ‘threatened’ incidences, as well as any necessary jurisdiction to halt any procedure in progress, impose penalties and deny federal disbursements.)
- Gives standing to institute an action to affected health care entities and the Attorney General. Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate the Director of the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to receive and investigate complaints alleging a violation of PPACA abortion provisions. (Oh … and if it’s not enough to impose the death penalty on women via the courts for having the misfortune to be suffering from life-threatening complications during a pregnancy, they’re going to create a whole bunch more government bureaucracy to ensure women die instead of getting the care they desperately need.
- Requires the Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to ensure that no multistate qualified health plan offered in an Exchange provides coverage of abortion services. (I’m so tired of hearing the GOP rant about the free enterprise system and letting the markets solve all the problems … this essentially prevents all of the major health insurance programs who offer health coverage to national employers participating in the health exchanges, with employees in multiple states, from offering insurance policies that include an abortion provision. If you’re thinking of having a baby … I sure hope you have an uneventful pregnancy … otherwise … you’re gonna have to pony up to the bar for all of the medical expenses once things go awry … and none of those expenses will be tax-deductible medical-related expenses.)
The bill is not expected to pass the Senate, and President Obama has promised to veto it even if it does, but this vote was more than symbolic — these provisions are likely to surface again, either as standalone legislation or as amendments to other bills. It’s obvious that Americans want Congress to work on creating jobs and helping our ailing economy, yet Speaker Boehner and his GOP supporters STILL focus their energies on attacking women’s health. The GOP majority in the house is doing absolutely every thing they possibly cant to:
- Prevent purchase of health insurance in the new Exchanges that includes abortion care, meaning that millions of women would either be prevented from purchasing insurance plans that cover abortion or would lose the coverage they currently have.
- Allow hospitals to refuse to perform emergency abortions, letting them deny emergency abortions to women whose life or health could be saved by the procedure.
- Take away existing health insurance coverage, opening an enormous loophole in the new health care law that would allow states to broaden refusal laws so that insurance companies in their state could deny women the access to contraception without co-pays that we secured, with your help, over the summer!
The stakes have never been higher for women in our country. It’s time to organize the fight against Nevada’s GOP representatives currently in Congress. Dina Titus is the only woman currently running for the House in Nevada and she is proudly supported by EMILY’s List, Women’s Campaign Forum, Planned Parenthood, and others.
During her term in the 111th Congress and throughout her years as Minority Leader in the Nevada Legislature she has been a constant fighter for our shared values. That is why she is working hard each day to return to Congress and continue to stand up for women in Nevada and throughout our country.
Related Posts:
New Planned Parenthood under Attack by GOP … AGAIN!
Republicans are at it again, continuing their witch hunt against Planned Parenthood. Now, they’ve demanded reams and reams of documents from health clinics across the country. And, they’re threatening, again, to strip Planned Parenthood of vital federal funding for services like cancer screenings and family planning.
You heard me right. Republicans in Congress want to cut cancer screenings for women. These Republicans are destroying women’s access to basic health care that allows all of us to control our lives and our futures. We need to fight back.
Don’t forget … in many areas, Planned Parenthood is the only option for women who need birth control, regular gynecological exams, or cancer screenings. Send an email to your Congressional Representatives letting them know that you support funding for Planned Parenthood.
Republicans won’t give a second thought to women or our access to health care. They don’t care about the issues that really matter to Americans, like creating jobs or getting the economy back on track. All they care about is scoring points with the Tea Party, protecting their corporate benefactors, and doing anything possible to prevent President Obama from securing a second term.

Jim Hightower, Op-Ed: “ALEC’s operatives take these cookie-cutter bills from state capitol to state capitol, getting Republican governors and key legislators to introduce them. Then the organization helps organize astroturf campaigns to ram such ugliness into law. Gov. Scott Walker’s repressive agenda in Wisconsin is an ALEC product. So is Arizona’s war on Latinos, as is Florida’s murderous “stand your ground” shoot-em-up law.”
Wendell Potter, News Analysis: “The recent news from the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation that health insurers will have to send rebate checks totaling more than $1.3 billion to Americans this summer was especially gratifying to me. It more than justified my decision three years ago to clue members of Congress in on how insurance companies have systematically been devoting ever-increasing portions of our premium dollars to rewarding their shareholders and top executives.”
Igor Volsky, Video Report: “Now we know, at least from both of your perspectives,” Maddow said, pointing to Castellanos and Romney surrogate Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), “women are not fairing worse than men in the economy that women aren’t getting paid less for equal work.” “It’s about policy and whether or not you want to fix some of the structural discrimination that women really do face that Republicans don’t believe is happening,” she added.
Paul Buchheit , Op-Ed: “In 2009, the United States ranked 26th out of 28 OECD countries in total federal, state, and local taxes as a percent of GDP. Only Chile and Mexico had lower tax rates. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, ‘federal taxes on middle-income Americans are near historic lows.’ For taxpayers in the top 1%, the tax burden has fallen dramatically in recent years.”
Ian Millhiser, News Report: “If this bill becomes law, Arizona’s government agencies would instantly be forbidden from doing anything to reduce poverty. Or to combat air pollution. Or to ensure that radioactive waste does not contaminate the environment. Or potentially to do anything at all to promote human health. Under this bill, Medicaid, state unemployment and welfare programs and nearly any environmental programs would need to cease, immediately.”
Thomas Magstadt, Op-Ed: “In the wake of the US bank-induced 2008 global financial crisis, policy makers, pundits, and economists suddenly rediscovered moral hazard in the under-regulated "free-market economy" both as a theoretical concept and as an existential danger. Nobody was more ardent in pushing this idea than then Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, who served in that position from 2006 to 2009.”
Robert Borosage, Op-Ed: “The Republican chair of the House education committee says he has “serious concerns” about the bill. And the Republican budget — championed by Paul Ryan and embraced as “marvelous” by Mitt Romney — both calls for deep cuts in Pell grants and assumes that the interest rates on government sponsored student loans will double. What are the Republican “concerns”? They claim to be opposed to the $6 billion cost of keeping the rate low. But jacking up the rate simply shifts that $6 billion cost onto the next generation of students who are already crushed by debt.”
Robert S. Becker, Op-Ed: “‘BP’s toxic sludge inundation,’ or ‘BP’s fatal frothy flood,’ even ‘BP’s contagion of contaminated crude’ — crude and indiscriminate indeed when this glut of gunk continues its death march. Even bacteria called upon to consume oil slicks are nixed, slain by two million gallons of the solvent concoction Corexit. Keen observer of the Gulf tragedy, I’d be downright remiss to withhold scandalous news about oil stuck to human skin, eyeless shrimp, fish-scale infections, or rising mortality for marine mammals and previously endangered sea turtles.”
Abrahm Lustgarten, News Analysis: “According to an FBI affidavit submitted to the court along with the indictment, Mix, who worked for BP until January 2012, was directly involved in BP’s efforts to understand how much oil was flowing out of the broken Macondo well. On April 21, 2010, Mix estimated that between 68,000 and 138,000 barrels of oil were leaking each day— far more than the 5,000 barrels that were estimated publicly at the time.”
Steve Horn, Op-Ed: “Yesterday, The Bakersfield Californian reported that another oil and gas industry giant is making its way to The Golden State: Hess Corporation. Hess has operations on six of the seven global continents and will be headed to California’s yet-to-be-fracked Monterey Shale basin, which contains some 15 billion barrels of proven recoverable shale oil, according to the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration.”
Brendan DeMelle, News Report: “Once again, the failure appears tied to a faulty casing job. The Douglas Budget reports that, “the horizontal part of the drilling had been completed. The drillers pulled out the bit and were going to run the casing into the horizontal leg of the well.” That’s when the blowout occurred, apparently. Tom Doll, a Wyoming State Oil and Gas supervisor, told local press that the state had no idea how much methane gas had spewed into the air following the blowout, and would rely on Chesapeake to supply an answer.”
News Report: “We’re dragging this secretive drone program out of the shadows and into the light of day,” said Medea Benjamin, one of the Summit organizers and author of the new book Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control. “It’s time for the American public to know the true extent—and consequences—of the killing and spying being done in our name.” Lawyers representing Pakistani drone-strike victims and journalists investigating the attacks shared their experiences of these events in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. New footage of interviews with victims was aired.
Javier Rodriguez, Op-Ed: “That war was no different than the occupation of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, the war against that other colonial power, Spain, the recent coup de tat against President Manuel Celaya and the democratically elected government in Honduras, and this one in particular hits the veins, the war on Mexico, where we lost over half of the territory. Indisputably history says, they have all been fabricated. No exceptions.”
Richard (RJ) Eskow, Op-Ed: “Now the President’s really cracking down on Wall Street, we were told. In the face of widespread criticism for his proposed foreclosure fraud settlement with five top banks, the President eventually accompanied that deal with a promise of tougher enforcement. He appointed New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who had been pursuing banks and resisting previous deals, to his previously lethargic mortgage fraud group.”
Prenatal testing during pregnancy is offered with the goal of
Mark Karlin, Truthout: “The construction of the ‘barrier’ wall – accompanying large-scale militarization (the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the FBI, the military etc.) – is on America’s southern border, and there is meaning in that. Its location is prima facie evidence that the ‘immigration issue’ is really a euphemism for keeping poor brown-skinned people out of the US – as well as creating a ‘practice’ zone for protecting American economic and political interests in Mexico and Central America.”


Medea Benjamin, Op-Ed: The women in the cell were proud of us for standing up to the banks; so were some of the police. “They were arrested for protesting against foreclosures at Bank of America,” one of the policemen told a policewoman while I was being fingerprinted. “I’m with you there,” she said. “Those bankers are thieves. They take government money to bail them out but then they refuse to lend money to black women like me. I lost my house because I couldn’t get a bank loan, even though I have a good, steady job.”
E.J. Dionne Jr., Op-Ed: “The nation’s Roman Catholic bishops will make an important decision this week: Do they want to defend the church’s legitimate interest in religious autonomy, or do they want to wage an election-year war against President Obama? And do the most conservative bishops want to junk the Roman Catholic Church as we have known it, with its deep commitment to both life and social justice, and turn it into the Tea Party at prayer?”

