Speak Out Against Fracking in Nevada

Fracking is a dangerous method of oil and gas extraction that contaminates water and puts nearby residents at risk of serious illnesses, including cancer and asthma. And it’s coming to Nevada.

As if fracking could get any worse for arid Nevada, each fracked oil well consumes millions of gallons of water and turns it into toxic wastewater. But that isn’t stopping Noble Energy from planning a massive 350,000 acre, $130 million fracking project in Elko County.

The project requires approval from Governor Sandoval to move forward. He’ll be under tremendous pressure to green-light the disastrous project, so it’s urgent that Nevada residents speak out against the project now.

Tell Governor Sandoval: “Don’t frack Nevada!”

Sign the Petition

Advertisements

The Election Is Over, But Our Work Is Just Beginning

—by Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch

Last night, I and many others breathed a sigh of relief as voters rejected a vision for our country that would have taken our economy, environmental regulations and consumer protections back to the 1920s. However, we cannot sit back and assume that protections for our food and water will improve. Rather, we need to take lessons from the last four years and redouble our organizing efforts to press the Obama administration, Congress and state legislatures across the country to keep our food safe and our water in public hands.

If there is one overarching lesson this election taught us, it’s that getting organized CAN overcome industry money in elections. Two ballot measures that Food & Water Watch worked on this cycle illustrate the need and power of organizing, even in the face of entrenched and powerful interests.

One of the most exciting victories from election night was in Longmont, Colorado, where voters passed an historic and precedent-setting ballot initiative to ban fracking. We were up against incredible odds in Longmont, with the oil and gas industry spending over half-a-million dollars for TV commercials, full-page ads and multiple mailers to try to scare Longmont citizens. Governor Hickenlooper sued the citizens of Longmont to slow down our efforts, and the Denver Post editorialized against this vote to ban fracking, but we were on the ground, knocking on doors, talking to voters and doing the hard work to support a citizen-led effort to protect our health, safety and property, and the citizens of Longmont still spoke loud and clear. We won with 60% of the vote!

We also worked hard in California with many of our allies to pass Proposition 37, which would require labeling for all genetically engineered foods. This popular measure was only narrowly defeated at the polls, due in large part to the massive spending by large chemical and junk food companies, which outspent our side by over $40 million.Despite this loss, support for GE food labels has never been stronger, and we will continue to build a robust national grassroots campaign to push for mandatory labeling across the country.

These measures prove what we already know: An educated and mobilized citizenry can fight back the corporate control of our common resources, but our work is far from over.

Right now, our policy experts are still sorting out what this election means for every issue we work on. I’m going to be giving a live telephone town hall meeting this Friday at 2 p.m. EST, and I want you to join me so you can hear our more detailed analysis of what this election means for your food and water, and you can ask me questions.
 
Protecting our water resources and making our food safe is challenging no matter which political party is in office. The truth is, because corporations have so much influence in our political and regulatory systems, we have to educate and mobilize citizens to build the power we need to hold our newly elected officials accountable. 

We believe there is a role for strong government regulations over corporations that are abusing our essential food and water resources. Only time will tell if the newly elected Congress can get anything done during the next session, but we know we will need your help to make sure that existing regulations for our food system, the environment and the energy industry are strengthened, not weakened. Among the issues that we will be calling upon you to be involved in are banning fracking and labeling genetically engineered foods at the local, state and national level.

Join me to talk about what the election means for our food and water

I hope to speak with you on Friday:
http://act.foodandwaterwatch.org/site/Survey?SURVEY_ID=3962&ACTION_REQUIRED=URI_ACTION_USER_REQUESTS

Thanks for taking action,

Wenonah Hauter
Executive Director—Food & Water Watch
act(at)fwwatch(dot)org

Say “NO” to the Pipeline

Some things are just bad ideas from the start.

The Southern Nevada Water Authority’s proposed water drill, pump and pipe scheme will devastate our people, plants, and animals in rural Eastern Nevada. That’s what a government approval of a Right-of-Way permit for a pipeline would do, according to a study of this unsustainable groundwater mining project.

Tell the Bureau of Land Management that its preferred alternative in the Environmental Impact Statement would cause unacceptable damages to our rural communities and tribes and to our public lands, springs, streams, and wildlife.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) just announced its preference for an alternative in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which would approve a $15.7 billion proposal of the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) for its 300-mile pipeline. The BLM did not study cheaper and more reliable water supply alternatives.

Please send an email today to the BLM asking them to choose to avoid environmental disaster by denying approval of SNWA’s water grab in this century.

Thanks for all you do for the environment,
Rose Strickland,
Water Project Chair, Toiyabe Chapter of the Sierra Club

P.S.Tell your friends and family to take action, and get your social media circles involved.

References:
http://nevada.sierraclub.org/

http://greatbasinwater.org/

In the Win Column: Flaming George Stoppered

EARTH JUSTIC PRESS RELEASE
May 17, 2012
Contact: McCrystie Adams, Earthjustice, (303) 996-9616

Denver, CO  —

Today, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) closed the door on what will hopefully be the last attempt to permit the Flaming Gorge Pipeline. FERC denied a request for rehearing from Aaron Million’s company, Wyco Power and Water, Inc.—an attempted “do-over” on FERC’s earlier denial of a preliminary permit. The Colorado developer has spent several years, and a claimed $5 million, attempting to launch this ill-conceived boondoggle. His proposal has been met with stiff opposition from conservation groups, individuals, and local communities and businesses. Now, FERC has provided a point-by-point refutation of Wyco’s application and rehearing request, and left no doubt that this pipeline remains a pipe dream.

The Green River. The diversion would potentially be a fatal blow to one of the West’s last great rivers. (NPS)

FERC’s order recognized that the Flaming Gorge Pipeline proposal is poorly defined, and the approval process would be “difficult and lengthy” due to the opposition and controversy surrounding the project. As a result, FERC states that it would be premature to issue the permit for the project at this time. Importantly, FERC also made clear that it would not license the entire 501-mile water conveyance project. FERC is now the second agency to reject Mr. Million’s attempts to review and approve the Pipeline, following the Army Corps of Engineers’ termination of its review of the project in 2011.

McCrystie Adams, staff attorney for Earthjustice, had the following statement on FERC’s action:

“The Flaming Gorge Pipeline would be one of the biggest, most expensive, most environmentally damaging water projects in the history of the western United States. FERC got it right when they dismissed the permit application, and got it right again today when they denied Mr. Million’s rehearing request. We hope this will finally put an end to Mr. Million’s attempt to profit at the expense of one of the West’s last great rivers and the fish and wildlife, as well as the local economies, which depend on it.

“This project—and any similar, large-scale transbasin diversions—is the worst way to meet Colorado’s water challenges. Such a project is unnecessary and distracts us from the important work we must do to build a secure water future. Unfortunately, we cannot be confident that this project is dead until Mr. Million and those who might follow his path abandon this futile scheme. We will continue to work to ensure that the Green River is protected and that this and other assaults on the West’s rivers do not succeed.”

The Flaming Gorge Pipeline is a massive transbasin water supply project that would annually take approximately 81 billion gallons (250,000 acre-feet) of water from the Flaming Gorge Reservoir and the Green River and pipe it more than 500 miles over the Continental Divide to Colorado’s Front Range and southeastern Wyoming. This diversion would have devastating impacts on the native fish and wildlife in the Green and Colorado Rivers, batter regional recreational opportunities and jobs that depend on river flows, and potentially be a fatal blow to one of the West’s last great rivers. The plight of the Green River and the impacts of the proposed Flaming Gorge Pipeline were highlighted this week when American Rivers declared it #2 on its list of “most endangered rivers” in the United States.

After an attempt at permitting through the Army Corps of Engineers was rejected last year, Aaron Million’s new company Wyco Power and Water, Inc. turned to the FERC. In February, FERC, acting well within its discretion and following its governing regulations, dismissed Wyco’s preliminary permit application as “premature.”

FERC, in its review of the preliminary permit application, rightly found that Wyco would be unable to gain the many authorizations and the design certainty necessary to file a license application within the three year permit term. Again failing to take “no” for an answer, Wyco then requested a rehearing, yet failed to provide any meaningful evidence or arguments that FERC got it wrong the first time. FERC’s ruling today upheld its earlier finding and left it clear that Wyco’s application is without merit.

Earthjustice had intervened in FERC’s preliminary permit review and filed papers urging the agency to deny the rehearing request. Earthjustice represents a coalition of ten conservation groups with interests throughout the Colorado River Basin: Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Rocky Mountain Wild, Save the Poudre: Poudre Waterkeeper, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Citizens for Dixie’s Future, Glen Canyon Institute, Living Rivers: Colorado Riverkeeper, and Utah Rivers Council.

Water Grab Case Cresting

The fight over the water grab pipeline proposed by the Southern Nevada Water Authority is coming to a crest.

Right now the State Engineer Jason King is taking public comment on whether to grant the SNWA the rights to drain water from White Pine County and Lincoln County in Northern Nevada and pipe it hundreds of miles South to Southern Nevada.

This is the same pipeline that has had its price tag increased from an initial $1 billion estimate to a staggering $15 billion (this number coming from the SNWA itself!).  Experts predict the pipeline could result in a tripling of water bills for Southern Nevada residents.

This pipeline wouldn’t  just put an enormous burden on the wallets of southern Nevadans; it would also put a huge burden on the Great Basin communities in northern Nevada. You see, the SNWA’s plan is to pump 50 billion gallons of water each year from the basin.  That could mean lesser opportunities for growth and expansion in the North because of the water-grab to the south.

The Great Basin cannot support southern Nevada’s never-ending thirst for water.

Tell the State Engineer we do NOT need this $15 billion water grab pipeline.